Call us now:
Rack MR – Requirements Development
Aisle M — Modernization
Library: Main Page — Professional Development (A) — Defense Enterprise (E) — Force Structure (F) — Modernization (M) — Personnel (P) — Readiness (R) — Special Enterprises (S) — Resource Management (X) — References (Z)
Modernization (M): Acquisition Frameworks (MA) — Capabilities Development (MC) — Defense Industrial Base (MD) — Program Management (MP) — Requirements Development (MR) — Science & Technology (MS) — Research, Development, Test, & Evaluation (MT) — Major Weapons Systems (MW)
Disclaimer: The inclusion of resources here is for informational, historical, and research purposes only and is provided as a service for US Army War College faculty, students, and graduates to support their educational and professional requirements. These may include outdated or superseded materials. The inclusion of these materials does not constitute endorsement by the U.S. Army War College, the U.S. Army, or Department of Defense.
The Military Services, Defense Agencies, and the Joint community assess, validate and prioritize new requirements using JCIDS, a capabilities-based process created in 2002 at the direction of Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld. Secretary Rumsfeld sent a directive to Gen Peter Pace, the Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff (VCJCS) and the Chairman of the Joint Requirements Oversight Council (JROC) to “get the requirements system fixed.” The note went on to say,
As Chairman of the JROC, please think through what we all need to do, individually or collectively, to get the requirements system fixed. It is pretty clear it is broken, and it is so powerful and inexorable that it invariably continues to require things that ought not to be required, and does not require things that need to be required. Please screw your head into that, and let’s have four or five of us meet and talk about it. Thanks.
—SecDef Donald Rumsfeld, Memo to VCJCS Gen Peter Pace, 18 March 2002
The JROC is the primary decision-making body used by CJCS to assist making assessments and providing advice on strategic requirements. The VCJCS chairs the JROC and the membership includes the vice chiefs of the military services with participation by the Combatant Commands as well as civilian advisers within the DoD. The JROC’s membership, broad responsibilities, and methods of sharing information with Congressional Defense Committees are specified in U.S. Code Title 10, and are captured in the JROC and JCIDS Charter, CJCSI 5123.01I (30 October 2021).
– Trent Hunton
This shelf provides resources associated with the requirements development process, including the roles and conduct of the Joint Requirements Oversight Council, or JROC. Although capabilities (rack MC) and requirements development have become more integrated procedurally, the underlying theoretical frameworks are different and therefore kept on different racks.
Faculty Publications:
- Thompson, Gregg and Lou Yuengert, “Aligning Vision to Capability: Fundamentals of Requirements Determination,” DM Faculty Paper #MR-001, 2021 Version | 2015 Version — Available upon request
- AcqNotes, “DoD JCIDS Process Overview,” Department of Defense, Washington, DC, November 4, 2012, video, 5:58, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GfSCqy-riTQ
Laws, Policies, Memos, and Regulations (sorted by regulation number):
- CJCS Instruction 3470.01, Rapid Validation and Resourcing of Joint Urgent Operational Needs (JUONs) in the Year of Execution, 2005.
- CJCS Instruction 5123.01, Charter of the Joint Requirements Oversight Council: D Version (2007) | F Version (2012) | G Version (2015) | H Version (2018) | I Version (2021)
- Note: H Version combined series 5123.01 with 3170.01 that covers the Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System, or JCIDS.
- Air Force Instruction 10-601, Capabilities-Based Requirements Development, July 2006.
- SECNAV Notice 500, Department of the Navy (DON) Requirements and Acquisition Process, February 2008.
Strategies and Reports:
- Defense Science Board, Report of the Defense Science Board Task Force on the Fulfillment of Urgent Operational Needs (Washington, DC: Office of the Undersecretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics, July 2009).
- Pendleton, John H. DEFENSE MANAGEMENT: Perspectives on the Involvement of the Combatant Commands in the Development of Joint Requirements, Report #GAO-11-527R (Washington, DC: Government Accountability Office, 2011).
- Pendleton, John H. DEFENSE MANAGEMENT: Guidance and Progress Measures Are Needed to Realize Benefits from Changes in DOD’s Joint Requirements Process, Report #GAO-12-339 (Washington, DC: Government Accountability Office, 2012).
- Sullivan, Michael J. DEFENSE ACQUISITIONS: DOD’s Requirements Determination Process Has Not Been Effective in Prioritizing Joint Capabilities, Report #GAO-08-1060 (Washington, DC: Government Accountability Office, 2008).
- Sullivan, Michael J. DEFENSE ACQUISITION PROCESS: Military Service Chiefs’ Concerns Reflect Need to Better Define Requirements before Programs Start, Report #GAO-15-469 (Washington, DC: Government Accountability Office, 2015).
Commentaries (inclusion does not represent endorsement):
- Hitchens, Theresa. “JROC Takes More Control Over Service Weapon Buys,” Breaking Defense, May 11, 2021, https://breakingdefense.com/2021/05/jroc-takes-more-control-over-service-weapon-buys/
- Holland, Thomas. “How the Army Ought to Write Requirements,” Military Review (November-December 2017): 100-105.
- Meinhart, Richard M., “Vice Chairmen of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and Leadership of the Joint Requirements Oversight Council,” Joint Force Quarterly 56 (1st Quarter 2010): 144-151.
- Modigliani, Pete et. al. Modernizing DoD Requirements: Enabling Speed, Agility, and Innovation (technical paper, MITRE Center for Technology and National Security, March 2020), https://www.mitre.org/publications/technical-papers/modernizing-dod-requirements-enabling-speed-agility-and-innovation
Title image credit: U.S. Army photo, 401st Army Field Support Brigade, public domain.
Modernization (M): Acquisition Frameworks (MA) — Capabilities Development (MC) — Defense Industrial Base (MD) — Program Management (MP) — Requirements Development (MR) — Science & Technology (MS) — Research, Development, Test, & Evaluation (MT) — Major Weapons Systems (MW)
Library: Main Page — Professional Development (A) — Defense Enterprise (E) — Force Structure (F) — Modernization (M) — Personnel (P) — Readiness (R) — Special Enterprises (S) — Resource Management (X) — References (Z)