Call us now:
Rack MD – Defense Industrial Base
Aisle M — Modernization
Library: Main Page — Professional Development (A) — Defense Enterprise (E) — Force Structure (F) — Modernization (M) — Personnel (P) — Readiness (R) — Special Enterprises (S) — Resource Management (X) — References (Z)
Modernization (M): Acquisition Frameworks (MA) — Capabilities Development (MC) — Defense Industrial Base (MD) — Program Management (MP) — Requirements Development (MR) — Science & Technology (MS) — Research, Development, Test, & Evaluation (MT) — Major Weapons Systems (MW)
Disclaimer: The inclusion of resources here is for informational, historical, and research purposes only and is provided as a service for US Army War College faculty, students, and graduates to support their educational and professional requirements. These may include outdated or superseded materials. The inclusion of these materials does not constitute endorsement by the U.S. Army War College, the U.S. Army, or Department of Defense.
This rack provides resources regarding the capabilities, capacities, and conditions of the defense industrial base relevant to modernization (for resources on the sustainment base and organic industrial base, refer to Aisle R, racks RO for Organic Industrial Base and RS for Defense Sustainment). Topics include intellectual property, contracting, supply chains (e.g., rare earth minerals and other upstream resources), and innovation.
This shelf contains general resources on the defense industrial base — will be divided into separate shelves at a future date.
Faculty Publications:
- None.
Laws, Policies, Memos, and Regulations (sorted by regulation number):
- 32 CFR Part 2004, National Industrial Security Program, 2018.
- Army Materiel Command, “U.S. Army Industrial Base Strategic Plan,” memorandum, April 2006.
- Army Regulation 700-90, Army Industrial Base Process, 2020.
- Department of Homeland Security, Defense Industrial Base: Critical Infrastructure and Key Resources, input to the National Infrastructure Protection Plan, 2007.
- Department of Homeland Security, Defense Industrial Base Sector-Specific Plan, annex to the National Infrastructure Protection Plan, 2010.
Strategies and Reports:
- Adams, John, Remaking American Security: Supply Chain Vulnerabilities & National Security Risks Across the U.S. Defense Industrial Base (Washington, DC: Alliance for American Manufacturing, 2013), https://docs.house.gov/meetings/FA/FA14/20130725/101216/HHRG-113-FA14-Wstate-AdamsB-20130725.pdf
- Note: The organization may no longer exist (site down much of 2021) — the PDF is accessed through the U.S. House of Representatives. If this becomes unreachable, please contact Thomas Galvin Dr
- Army, Small Business Innovative Research (SBIR) (Washington, DC: Department of the Army, 2009).
- Army Materiel Command, The Metal Book (Redstone Arsenal, AL: U.S. Army Materiel Command, 2007).
- Blakey, Marion C. (president). The Unseen Cost: Industrial Base Consequences of Defense Strategy Choices (Arlington, VA: Aerospace Industries Association, 2009).
- Note: This report is no longer publicly available on the AIA website.
- Deloitte, Manufacturing USA: A Third-Party Evaluation of Program Design and Progress (New York: Deloitte USA, 2017), https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/us/Documents/manufacturing/us-mfg-manufacturing-USA-program-and-process.pdf
- Deloitte, Third-party Risk Management: Cybersecurity in the Defense Industrial Base (DIB) (New York: Deloitte USA, 2019), https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/us/Documents/manufacturing/us-cybersecurity-defense-industrial-base.pdf.
- Department of Defense, Annual Industrial Capabilities Report to Congress: 2006 Version | 2007 Version | 2013 Version | 2016 Version | 2018 Version | 2020 Version
- Department of Defense, Office of Industrial Policy, Assessing and Strengthening the Manufacturing and Defense Industrial Base and Supply Chain Resiliency in the United States, Report to President Donald J. Trump by the Interagency Task Force in Fulfillment of Executive Order 13806 (Washington, DC: Department of Defense, 2018).
- Department of Defense, Performance of the Defense Acquisition System (Washington, DC: Department of Defense): 2014 Report | 2016 Report
- Industrial College of the Armed Forces, Industry Study: Report on Strategic Materials: 2005 Report | 2007 Report
- Industrial College of the Armed Forces, Land Combat Systems Industry (Washington, DC: National Defense University): 2012 Report | 2014 Report | 2016 Report
- Naval Postgraduate School, Acquisition Research: Creating Synergy for Informed Change, Excerpt from the Proceedings of the 19th Annual Acquisition Research Symposium (Monterey, CA: Naval Postgraduate School, May 11-12, 2022).
- O’Hanlon, Michael O. The National Security Industrial Base: A Crucial Asset of the United States, Whose Future May be in Jeopardy (Washington, DC: Brookings Institute, 2011).
- Office of Trade and Manufacturing Policy, How China’s Economic Aggression Threatens the technologies and Intellectual Property of the United States and the World (Washington, DC: The White House, 2018).
- Peters, Heidi M., Defense Primer: U.S. Defense Industrial Base, Report #IF10548 (Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service, 2020).
- Peters, Heidi M., et al., Defense Primer: The National Technology and Industrial Base, Report #IF1311 (Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service, 2023).
- Ridge, Tom and Robert B. Stephan. Preparing for 21st Century Risks: Revitalizing American Manufacturing to Protect, Respond, and Recover (Arlington, VA: Alliance for American Manufacturing, 2012), https://www.americanmanufacturing.org/research/preparing-for-21st-century-risks/
- U.S. Government Accountability Office, Defense Industrial Base: DOD Should Take Actions to Strengthen Its Risk Mitigation Approach, Report #GAO-22-104154 (Washington, DC: GAO, July 2022), https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-22-104154
- Van Atta, Richard (Project Leader), Export Controls and the U.S. Defense Industrial Base (Washington, DC: Institute for Defense Analyses, 2007).
- Watts, Barry D., The U.S. Defense Industrial Base: Past, Present, and Future (Washington, DC: Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments, 2008), https://csbaonline.org/research/publications/the-us-defense-industrial-base-past-present-and-future
- Watts, Barry D. and Todd Harrison, Sustaining Critical Sectors of the U.S. Defense Industrial Base (Washington, DC: Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments, 2011), https://csbaonline.org/research/publications/sustaining-critical-sectors-of-the-u-s-defense-industrial-base
Commentaries (inclusion does not represent endorsement):
- “Unlocking Industry Opportunities,” special issue, Army AL&T (January-March 2019).
- Borghard, Erica D. and Shawn W. Lonergan, “Ensuring the Cybersecurity and Resilience of the Defense Industrial Base,” Lawfare, March 12, 2020, https://www.lawfareblog.com/ensuring-cybersecurity-and-resilience-defense-industrial-base
- Davis, M. Thomas and Nathaniel C. Fick, “America’s Endangered Arsenal of Democracy,” Joint Force Quarterly 62 (3rd Quarter 2011): 89-95.
- Eaglen, Mackenzie and Eric Sayers, “Maintaining the Superiority of America’s Defense Industrial Base,” The Heritage Foundation, May 22, 2009, https://www.heritage.org/defense/report/maintaining-the-superiority-americas-defense-industrial-base
- Eisenhower, Dwight D., “Military-Industrial Complex Speech,” retrieved from the Lillian Goldman Law Library, Yale University, 1961.
- Floyd, Dave and Tom Gorman, “Public-Private Partnerships,” Defense AT&L (January-February 2013): 32-35.
- Harper, Jon and Stew Magnuson, “(Updated) Report: Defense Industrial Base Faces ‘Unprecedented Challenges’,” National Defense, October 4, 2018, https://www.nationaldefensemagazine.org/articles/2018/10/4/report-defense-industrial-base-faces-unprecedented-challenges
- Manufacturers Alliance, “Myth-Busting American Manufacturing,” Manufacturers Alliance, May 18, 2017,https://www.manufacturersalliance.org/research-insights/myth-busting-american-manufacturing
- Micucci, Michael A. “Great Expectations: Building Stronger Government-Industry Relationships,” Defense AT&L(March-April 2009): 16-21.
- Mishel, Lawrence. “Yes, Manufacturing Still Provides a Pay Advantage, but Staffing Firm Outsourcing is Eroding It,” Economic Policy Institute, March 12, 2018, https://www.epi.org/publication/manufacturing-still-provides-a-pay-advantage-but-outsourcing-is-eroding-it/
- Nager, Adams. “Trade vs. Productivity: What Caused U.S. Manufacturing’s Decline and How to Revive It,” Information Technology & Innovation Foundation, February 2017, https://itif.org/publications/2017/02/13/trade-vs-productivity-what-caused-us-manufacturings-decline-and-how-revive
- Pierce, Justin R. and Peter K. Schott, The Surprisingly Swift Decline of U.S. Manufacturing Employment (working paper, Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, 2012), https://www.nber.org/papers/w18655
- Sansone, Stan. “Other Transactions (flexible contracting) can be applied to more than Acquisition,” Strategic Institute, October 12, 2022, https://strategicinstitute.org/podcast/other-transactions-flexible-contracting-can-be-applied-to-more-than-acquisition/
- Thompson, Lynne C. and Shiela R. Ronis, U.S. Defense Industrial Base: National Security Implications of a Globalized World (Washington, DC: National Defense University Press, 2006).
- Contains Jacques S. Gansler, “The U.S. Defense Industrial Base: From the End of the Cold War to the Present,” pp. 12-19 and Pierre Chao, “The Future of the U.S. Defense Industrial Base: National Security Implications of a Globalized World,” pp. 31-39.
- Votel, Joseph and James Geurts, “Forging the Industrial Network the Nation Needs,” The National Interest, June 24, 2022, https://nationalinterest.org/feature/forging-industrial-network-nation-needs-203114
- Zaleski, Andrew. “China’s Blueprint to Crush the US Robotics Industry,” CNBC Disruptor 50, September 6, 2017, https://www.cnbc.com/2017/09/06/chinas-blueprint-to-crush-the-us-robotics-industry.html
This program is run by the DoD’s Information Security Oversight Office and is also known as the NISP. The NISP safeguards classified information the Federal
Government or foreign governments release to contractors, licensees, grantees, and certificate holders. This revision adds provisions incorporating executive branch insider threat policy and minimum standards, identifies the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) as new cognizant security agencies (CSAs), and adds responsibilities for all CSAs and non-CSA departments and agencies (to reflect oversight functions that are already detailed for private sector entities in the National Industrial Security Program Operating Manual (NISPOM)). This revision also makes other administrative changes to be consistent with recent revisions to the NISPOM and with updated regulatory language and style.
Faculty Publications:
- None.
Laws, Policies, Memos, and Regulations (sorted by regulation number):
- 32 CFR Part 2004, National Industrial Security Program, 2018.
- 32 CFR Part 117, National Industrial Security Program Operating Manual, 2020.
Strategies and Reports:
- None.
Commentaries (inclusion does not represent endorsement):
- None.
Title image credit: U.S. Army photo, public domain.
Modernization (M): Acquisition Frameworks (MA) — Capabilities Development (MC) — Defense Industrial Base (MD) — Program Management (MP) — Requirements Development (MR) — Science & Technology (MS) — Research, Development, Test, & Evaluation (MT) — Major Weapons Systems (MW)
Library: Main Page — Professional Development (A) — Defense Enterprise (E) — Force Structure (F) — Modernization (M) — Personnel (P) — Readiness (R) — Special Enterprises (S) — Resource Management (X) — References (Z)