Call us now:
Rack FA – Force Strategy & Planning
Aisle F — Force Structure
Library: Main Page — Professional Development (A) — Defense Enterprise (E) — Force Structure (F) — Modernization (M) — Personnel (P) — Readiness (R) — Special Enterprises (S) — Resource Management (X) — References (Z)
Force Structure (F): Force Strategy & Planning (FA) — Concepts and Doctrine (FC) — Force Development (FD) — Manning the Force (FM) — Organizing and Equipping the Force (FO) — Force Posture & Stationing (FP) — Roles and Missions (FR)
Disclaimer: The inclusion of resources here is for informational, historical, and research purposes only and is provided as a service for US Army War College faculty, students, and graduates to support their educational and professional requirements. These may include outdated or superseded materials. The inclusion of these materials does not constitute endorsement by the U.S. Army War College, the U.S. Army, or Department of Defense.
Strategic Force Planning is the first step in determining what kind of force to build and where to apply precious resources. Led primarily by OSD, this process involves many stakeholders working to align the department to the competitive environment. Force Planning asks and answers some basic questions that help focus the Services as they build the force. What does the force need to do? How will it do the critical tasks? Where does it need to be to accomplish assigned missions?
DoD has standard processes that support answering these questions. The National Defense Strategy and the Defense Planning Guidance (available in the General References aisle) are critical documents that help synchronize efforts and guide resource allocation within the department. DoD must make tradeoffs when designing its strategy and building its force. Aligning ends, ways, and means is not easy, and requires the balancing of strategic risks in an area of uncertainty. These tradeoffs are at the heart of strategic force planning.
This rack is focused on strategy development and planning for an overall service or defense structure. Such strategies should theoretically cover all the component constructs of force structure outlined in the Aisle F page.
This shelf contains general resources on force strategies and planning for the defense enterprise.
Faculty Publications:
- Crane, Conrad, Michael E. Lynch, Jessica J. Sheets, and Shane P. Reilly, More Bang for Your Buck: Eisenhower’s New Look Policy and the Armed Forces (Carlisle, PA: U.S. Army Heritage and Education Center). Available on request.
Laws, Policies, Memos, and Regulations (sorted by regulation number):
- CJCSM 3500.04, Universal Joint Task Manual: F Version (2011) | E Version (2008) | C Version (as Universal Joint Task List, 2002)
- JS, Capabilities-Based Assessment (CBA) User’s Guide, March 2009.
- JFCOM, A Framework for Discussing U.S. Joint Force Structures During the Next Administration, November 12, 2008.
- Also see ES.JS, Joint Strategic Planning System in the ES – Strategic Planning rack.
Strategies and Reports:
- Cancian, Mark F. series on U.S. Military force structure:
- U.S. Military Forces in FY2022: Peering into the Abyss—The Budget and Strategy Overview (Washington, DC: Center for Strategic and International Studies, October 2021), https://www.csis.org/analysis/military-forces-fy-2022-peering-abyss-budget-and-strategy-overview — also see below for separate reports on the services:
- U.S. Military Forces in FY2021: The Budget and Strategy Overview: Four Challenges and a Wild Card (Washington, DC: Center for Strategic & International Studies, October 2020), https://www.csis.org/analysis/military-forces-fy-2021-budget-and-strategy-overview-four-challenges-and-wild-card
- Congressional Budget Office, The U.S. Military’s Force Structure: A Primer, 2021 Update (Washington, DC: Congressional Budget Office, 2021).
- Eaglen, MacKenzie. Shrinking Bureaucracy, Overhead, and Infrastructure: Why This Defense Drawdown Must be Different for the Pentagon (Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute, 2013), https://www.aei.org/research-products/working-paper/shrinking-bureaucracy-overhead-and-infrastructure-why-this-defense-drawdown-must-be-different-for-the-pentagon/
- Eaglen, MacKenzie. “The Bias for Capability over Capacity has Created a Brittle Force,” commentary, War on the Rocks, November 17, 2022, https://warontherocks.com/2022/11/the-bias-for-capability-over-capacity-has-created-a-brittle-force/
- Feickert, Andrew. Army Drawdown and Restructuring: Background and Issues for Congress, Report #R42493 (Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service, 2013).
- Fitzsimmons, Michael. Scenario Planning and Strategy in the Pentagon (Carlisle, PA: Strategic Studies Institute, 2019).
- Gunziger, Mark. Shaping America’s Future Military: Toward a New Force Planning Construct (Washington, DC: Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments, 2013), https://csbaonline.org/research/publications/shaping-americas-future-military-toward-a-new-force-planning-construct
- Gunziger, Mark, Bryan Clark, David Johnson, and Jesse Sloman. Force Planning for the Era of Great Power Competition (Washington, DC: Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments, 2017), https://csbaonline.org/research/publications/force-planning-for-the-era-of-great-power-competition
- Klimas, Joshua and Gian Gentile. Planning an Army for the 21st Century: Principles to Guide U.S. Army Force Size, Mix, and Component Distribution (Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, November 2018), https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/perspectives/PE200/PE291/RAND_PE291.pdf
- Mazaar, Michael J. et al. The U.S. Department of Defense’s Planning Process: Components and Challenges (Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2019), https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR2173z2.html
- Owens, Mackubin T. “Military Force Planning and National Security,” in Johnson, Derek S., Nikolas K. Gvosdevb, and John A. Cloud (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of U.S. National Security (Oxford: University of Oxford Press, July 2018), https://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190680015.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780190680015-e-14
- Note: May be firewalled. Can be accessed from the library or on request from Thomas Galvin Dr
- Pendleton, John. DEFENSE STRATEGY: Revised Analytic Approach Needed to Support Force Structure Decision-Making, Report #GAO-19-385 (Washington, DC: Government Accountability Office, 2019).
Commentaries (inclusion does not represent endorsement):
- Haddick, Robert. “The Pentagon Needs a New Way of War,” War on the Rocks, March 18, 2014, https://warontherocks.com/2014/03/the-pentagon-needs-a-new-way-of-war/
- Hicks, Kathleen H., “Defense Strategy and the Iron Triangle of Painful Trade-Offs,” Center for Strategic and International Studies, June 22, 2017, https://defense360.csis.org/defense-strategy-and-the-iron-triangle-of-painful-tradeoffs/
- Mazarr, Michael J. et al., The U.S. Department of Defense’s Planning Process: Components and Challenges (Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2019), Summary, https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR2173z2.html
This shelf is for Army-specific force strategies and planning constructs.
Faculty Publications:
- Army Force Management School, How the Army Runs Primer, 2020 version | 2010 version
- Army Force Management School, Army Force Management Model: Strategy to Structure, 2011 version | 2009 version — Lost, please help locate…
- Army Force Management School, An Overview of Army Structure and Capabilities, May 2012
Laws, Policies, Memos, and Regulations (sorted by regulation number):
- Army, Army Strategic Planning Guidance, 2013.
- Army, ADRP 1-03, The Army Universal Task List, 2015 (rescinded May 2022). Not presently available.
- Previously Army, FM 7-15: The Army Universal Task List — Change 10 (2012) | Change 2 (2006)
- TRADOC Pam 525-66, Force Operating Capabilities, March 2008.
Strategies and Reports:
- Cancian, Mark F., U.S. Military Forces in FY2021 — Army (Washington, DC: Center for Strategic and International Studies, October 2020), https://www.csis.org/analysis/us-military-forces-fy-2021-army
- Klimas, Joshua and Gian Gentile, Planning an Army for the 21st Century: Principles to Guide U.S. Army Force Size, Mix, and Component Distribution (Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, November 2018), https://www.rand.org/pubs/perspectives/PE291.html
- St. Laurent, Janet, FORCE STRUCTURE: Army Needs to Provide DoD and Congress More Visibility Regarding Modular Force Capabilities and Implementation Plans, Report #GAO-06-745
Commentaries (inclusion does not represent endorsement):
- Bonds, Timothy M. Limiting Regret: Building the Army We Will Need (Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2015), https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR1320.html
- Cohen, Raphael S. “Ukraine and the New Two War Construct,” commentary, War on the Rocks, January 5, 2023, https://warontherocks.com/2023/01/ukraine-and-the-new-two-war-construct/
- Freedberg Jr., Sydney J. “Army Wants Smaller Brigades, Stronger Divisions & Lots of Robots,” Breaking Defense, November 6, 2020, https://breakingdefense.com/2020/11/army-wants-smaller-brigades-stronger-divisions-lots-of-robots/
- Mehta, Aaron. “‘No Lines on the Battlefield’: Pentagon’s New War-Fighting Concept Takes Shape,” Defense News, August 14, 2020, https://www.defensenews.com/pentagon/2020/08/14/no-lines-on-the-battlefield-the-pentagons-new-warfighting-concept-takes-shape/
This shelf is for Air Force -specific force strategies and planning constructs. This is a stub — please help!
Faculty Publications:
- None.
Laws, Policies, Memos, and Regulations (sorted by regulation number):
- None.
Strategies and Reports:
- Cancian, Mark F., U.S. Military Forces in FY2021 — Air Force (Washington, DC: Center for Strategic and International Studies, October 2020), https://www.csis.org/analysis/us-military-forces-fy-2021-air-force
- National Commission on the Structure of the Air Force. Report to the President and Congress of the United States (January 30, 2014).
Commentaries (inclusion does not represent endorsement):
- Axe, David. “How Trump Could Actually Make the US Air Force Great Again,” VICE, December 1, 2016, https://www.vice.com/en/article/wnxbx4/how-trump-could-actually-make-the-us-air-force-great-again
- Cohen, Rachel. “The Air and Space Forces Want to Break the Mold. Here’s How They’re Starting,” Air Force Magazine, September 14, 2020, https://www.airforcemag.com/the-air-and-space-forces-want-to-break-the-mold-heres-how-theyre-starting/
- Deptula, David A. and Douglas A. Birkey, “Building the Air Force We Need,” Air Force Magazine, April 15, 2019, https://www.airforcemag.com/article/building-the-air-force-we-need/
- Garretson, Peter. “Finding Strategic Balance: How Should the USAF Balance Continuing Irregular Requirements with High-End A2/AD Requirements,” Small Wars Journal, December 23, 2013, https://smallwarsjournal.com/jrnl/art/finding-strategic-balance
This shelf is for Marine Corps-specific force strategies and planning constructs. This is a stub — please help!
Faculty Publications:
- None.
Laws, Policies, Memos, and Regulations (sorted by regulation number):
- Berger, David H. Commandant’s Planning Guidance: 38th Commandant of the Marine Corps, 2019.
Strategies and Reports:
- Cancian, Mark F., U.S. Military Forces in FY2021 — Marine Corps (Washington, DC: Center for Strategic and International Studies, October 2020), https://www.csis.org/analysis/us-military-forces-fy-2021-marine-corps
- Feickert, Andrew. Marine Corps Drawdown, Force Structure Initiatives, and Roles and Missions: Background and Issues for Congress, Report #R43355 (Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service, 2014).
Commentaries (inclusion does not represent endorsement):
- Berger, David H. “Notes on Designing the Marine Corps of the Future,” War on the Rocks, December 5, 2019, https://warontherocks.com/2019/12/notes-on-designing-the-marine-corps-of-the-future/
- Jensen, Benjamin. “The Rest of the Story: Evaluating the U.S. Marine Corps Force Design 2030,” War on the Rocks, April 27, 2020, https://warontherocks.com/2020/04/the-rest-of-the-story-evaluating-the-u-s-marine-corps-force-design-2030/
This shelf is for Navy-specific force strategies and planning constructs. This is a stub — please help!
Faculty Publications:
- None.
Laws, Policies, Memos, and Regulations (sorted by regulation number):
- None.
Strategies and Reports:
- Cancian, Mark F., U.S. Military Forces in FY2021 — Navy (Washington, DC: Center for Strategic and International Studies, October 2020), https://www.csis.org/analysis/us-military-forces-fy-2021-navy
- O’Rourke, Ronald. Navy Force Structure and Shipbuilding Plans: Background and Issues for Congress, Report #RL32665 (Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service): August 2014 Version | October 2020 Version
Commentaries (inclusion does not represent endorsement):
- Barber III, Arthur H. “Redesign the Fleet,” Proceedings 145, no. 1 (January 2019): 1391, https://www.usni.org/magazines/proceedings/2019/january/redesign-fleet
- NOTE: May be firewalled (Premium-only content as of October 2021)
- Cordesman, Anthony H. and Hans U. Kaeser, “Abandon Ships: The Costly Illusion of Unaffordable Transformation,” Center for Strategic and International Studies, August 25, 2008, https://www.csis.org/analysis/abandon-ships
- Patch, John, “The Maritime Strategy We Need,” Armed Forces Journal, June 1, 2007, http://armedforcesjournal.com/the-maritime-strategy-we-need/
- NOTE: Armed Forces Journal no longer exists and the site could be taken down at any time.
This shelf is for Reserve Component force strategies and planning constructs not otherwise covered by the services. This is a stub — please help!
Faculty Publications:
- None.
Laws, Policies, Memos, and Regulations (sorted by regulation number):
- None.
Strategies and Reports:
- Graham, David R. (project leader). Evolution of the Military’s Current Active-Reserve Force Mix, Report #D-4968 (Washington, DC: Institute for Defense Analyses, 2015).
Commentaries (inclusion does not represent endorsement):
- None.
This shelf is for Space Force-specific force strategies and planning constructs. This is a stub — please help!
Faculty Publications:
- None.
Laws, Policies, Memos, and Regulations (sorted by regulation number):
- None.
Strategies and Reports:
- Department of the Air Force, Comprehensive Plan for the Organizational Structure of the U.S. Space Force: Report to Congressional Committees (Washington, DC: Department of the Air Force, 2020).
- Chaplain, Cristina. SPACE COMMAND AND CONTROL: Comprehensive Planning and Oversight Could Help DoD Acquire Critical Capabilities and Address Challenges, Report #GAO-20-146 (Washington, DC: Government Accountability Office, 2020).
- Spirtas, Michael, et al. A Separate Space: Creating a Military Service for Space (Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2020), https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR4263.html
Commentaries (inclusion does not represent endorsement):
- Hitchens, Theresa, “Space Force Nears Year Mark, Acquisition Remains a Quagmire,” Breaking Defense, October 2, 2020, https://breakingdefense.com/2020/10/as-space-force-nears-one-year-mark-acquisition-remains-a-quagmire/
Title image credit: U.S. Army War College photo, public domain.
Force Structure (F): Force Strategy & Planning (FA) — Concepts and Doctrine (FC) — Force Development (FD) — Manning the Force (FM) — Organizing and Equipping the Force (FO) — Force Posture & Stationing (FP) — Roles and Missions (FR)
Library: Main Page — Professional Development (A) — Defense Enterprise (E) — Force Structure (F) — Modernization (M) — Personnel (P) — Readiness (R) — Special Enterprises (S) — Resource Management (X) — References (Z)